1.
What is
art?
I believe art has a different definition depending
on the culture and time period. For me,
art has to possess a certain purpose and relevance; whether that is reflected towards
me, a community or place in time. The period
of the Byzantine Empire is one of my favorites in art history. The purpose behind each piece, for the most
part, is clear (religious significance). The esthetic and design seem timeless because
it appeals to a wide audience (not just religious). Art has a variety of forms and range. For example, buildings from the Italian
Renaissance still stand with character and theatrical charm, but that isn’t to
say that the Disney Opera House doesn’t.
It is all about communicating with the audience of a particular
era. And, as long as the artist is
communicating effectively with care and craftsmanship, he will be successful. I may sound dramatic, but I believe art and
creativity are one of the more unique characteristics of being human. Without a direction, passion, and significance,
artwork can no longer be considered “special.”
2. What is an artist? Is this an exclusive or inclusive title? Are titles necessary?
2. What is an artist? Is this an exclusive or inclusive title? Are titles necessary?
To tie into the previous question, an artist
is someone who takes the time and care to create something that has value and
meaning to themselves or an audience. I
think when someone is considered “successful” they then become an exclusive
artist. No matter how down to earth and
all-encompassing Andy Warhol or Martin Kippenberger may be as people, their
success in the art world has elevated them into a different class of
artists. However, I’d like to believe that
the art made by the 5 year olds I work with are very thought out and successful
in their own way. They usually put a lot
of effort and time into making something special for their parents and I call
them all little artists! (So cute!) So, I’m
a little on the fence about the necessity of artists.
3. Why make art at all?
3. Why make art at all?
I think people make art because it is a release. People make art for all sorts of reasons like;
sending political, social, and emotional messages. Art is another way to communicate to others
in ways that music or writing fail to.
It is a part of every culture and holds special significance to
countless people.
4. How do you assess art? (What makes art successful? Is there such a thing as "good" art v/s "bad"? Does the distinction between "high brow" and "low brow" exist? Should it?)
4. How do you assess art? (What makes art successful? Is there such a thing as "good" art v/s "bad"? Does the distinction between "high brow" and "low brow" exist? Should it?)
Good art and bad art are subjective. Yes,
there is certain amount of skill that is needed to go into a piece, but whether
it is judged as good or bad depends on the feedback of the audience. There are many “high brow” pieces that I don’t
think are particularly skillful or good, but because many people enjoy what it
represents, it is considered a good piece in general. I do think that the distinction between high
and low brow should exist because it gives us a point of measurement. Otherwise, every museum would be filled with
random un-thoughtful pieces.
No comments:
Post a Comment